Case Studies

The work, told plainly.

A selection of engagements from across our practice. AI programs at top US banks. SAFe® rollouts inside insurance carriers. Government AI under federal scrutiny. Manufacturing turnarounds that held a full year after handover. Every case study below is told in our clients' words and signed off by the executive sponsor who lived it.

Every case study below shipped on this arc
01 · Weeks 0 – 2Discover & scopeSponsor outcome named. Data audit. Draft architecture.
02 · Weeks 3 – 6Pilot in productionReal data, real cohort. Evaluation harness from commit one.
03 · Weeks 7 – 10ProductionizeSystem hardened. Runbook written. First three on-call pairs.
04 · Weeks 11 – 2290-day stabilizationNamed principal in steering. Your team owns extension.
Case Anatomy

Anatomy of a Rockmere case study.

Every case study on this page follows the same seven-step structure. Built to read the way an executive sponsor would want to read it at a steering committee.

The challenge

The named business problem the executive sponsor cares about most. Stated in their language, not ours.

The constraints

The non-negotiables that shaped the work: the people who had to sign off, the systems we had to integrate with, the change posture of the organization.

Our approach

The architecture decision. The model and data choices. The named Rockmere principal and the practitioners on the pod.

What we delivered

The production system. Named integrations. The runbook your team uses every morning. The artefacts the organization keeps after we exit.

The result

Measured outcomes the executive sponsor reported to their board. Numbers we can defend, told in their words.

Engagement timeline

Week-by-week shape of the work. The dates the steering committee met. What was decided in each room.

What survived past us

The team that owns the system today. The runbook the on-call rotation reads at 2 a.m. The patterns the next engagement reuses.

Outcomes Ledger

A log of what's landed.

Five recent engagements, told in the outcomes the executive sponsors reported to their boards. Numbers are the numbers, not the marketing version.

2026 Q1

Top-5 US Bank

Financial Services

An investigation copilot used across thousands of fraud cases.

38% faster
2025 Q4

National payer

Healthcare

Eligibility AI built inside the system clinicians already use.

43% less manual
2025 Q3

Mid-market manufacturer

Manufacturing

A Lean operating system rolled across three plants.

$80M / yr
2025 Q2

Public-sector agency

Government

An ART launched to predictable cadence across nine teams.

87% PI Obj.
2025 Q1

P&C carrier

Insurance

Demand-planning AI tied to underwriting and renewals.

27% retained
Anonymization Rules

What we anonymize. What we never will.

Engagement letters dictate what we can publish. We hide identifying data when the letter says so. We never hide the outcome.

We anonymize

What stays out of the public record.

  • Client name, where the engagement letter forbids attribution.
  • Individual employee names. We name our own practitioners only.
  • Internal product names, project codes, and integration partners (we describe the system class instead).
  • Dollar amounts, where the sponsor prefers percentages.
  • Geography below the country level.
We never anonymize

What we report exactly as it happened.

  • The outcome. Percentages and metrics are exactly as the sponsor reported to their board.
  • The standards the work was held to.
  • The Rockmere principal who led the engagement.
  • The engagement duration and team size.
  • The tools and architecture choices we made.
FAQs

Clear answers
to your questions.

  • Yes. Every case study on this page is a real engagement, documented at stabilization handover. Each metric is the number the executive sponsor reported to their board, not a marketing figure.

  • The documented outcomes here include a 38% reduction in bank fraud handle-time, 87% PI Objective achievement on an insurance SAFe® ART, 42% faster Medicaid eligibility dispositions, 11 OEE points in 90 days in manufacturing, and $40M in working capital freed through CPG demand planning.

  • Engagement letters dictate what we can publish. We hide identifying detail (client name, internal product names, geography below country level) when the letter requires it, using the system class instead. We never anonymize the outcome, the standards the work was held to, or the named principal who led it.

  • Each metric is the one the executive sponsor reported to their board at handover. We do not publish a number we cannot defend in the room with the people who lived the engagement, and we can arrange a reference conversation for serious evaluations.

  • If regulatory depth and senior judgment change your outcome, almost certainly. Review the industries we know best, then bring us a measurable problem and an executive sponsor and we will tell you on the first call whether we are the right firm.

Want to be the next one?

Bring a measurable outcome and an executive sponsor. We'll bring the team that delivers it.

Start a Project →